
If there’s one true-life adventure that almost every European school child knows it’s the story of Norwegian’s Thor Heyerdahl and his Kon Tiki Express, the name given to the 1947 trip across the Pacific on a raft.
In 1950, Thor Heyerdahl made an Academy Award winning documentary about the journey, but now

Briefly, Heyerdahl had a theory that South Americans originally populated
The film starts in 1920. We see Thor as a young boy who accidentally falls into freezing water and is eventually rescued by a friend. “Promise you’ll never do something like that again,” Thor’s father demands, but the boy never answers; he has no intention of obeying his father’s order. As portrayed in the film, Thor is the kind of boy who will always take risks to prove a point, which is exactly what he does years later in 1947 when he sets sail across the Pacific.

The first time we see Thor as an adult, played by Norwegian actor Pål Sverre Valheim Hagen, he’s already thinking of setting sail. With his Scandinavian good looks, healthy, tanned features and blonde hair it’s amazing how the camera often catches him looking like a young Peter O’Toole, reminiscent of O’Toole’s adventurous ocean going Lord Jim days. As an actor he’s a stiffer than a plank of the balsawood used to make the raft, but photogenically he looks perfect, almost godlike with his cinematic good looks cast against a backdrop of clear, blue skies and the deep azure blue of the Pacific Ocean. “Early man did not see the ocean as a barrier,” Thor tells us, “But as a means of communication.” Thor and his crew spend the rest of the film trying to prove that point.
Surprisingly, Kon Tiki has been awarded a PG-13 rating which seems at odds with the film I saw. Perhaps the age restriction is there because of the tense, almost eerie moment when a huge whale, looking like an enormous sea monster, glides under the raft endangering the crew, or perhaps it’s the moment when a shark is literally pulled out of the sea by a hook and sliced apart. Such scenes could easily upset the very young, but those moments aside, there is little in Kon Tiki to offend. If anything, the film is actually a little too squeaky clean. Considering this is a story of several men stuck together in a confined space experiencing perilous life or death situations, tempers rarely flare, cussing is completely absent, and politeness prevails.

Norwegian critics have complained that the film fictionalizes a lot of what really happened – the film tells us that Thor can’t swim, yet records show he was swimming in 1937, ten years before Kon Tiki – but real life doesn’t always transfer well to a big screen adventure. Perhaps the film isn’t a real reflection of everything that happened, and events are condensed in order to heighten the more dramatic elements, but for me it’s close enough. Reading books and watching documentaries are good for understanding academically what happened, but old-fashioned, adventurous films deliver the emotional impact, and Kon Tiki is as as rousing as a sea-faring exploit gets.
For more film & local theatre reviews CLICK HERE to go to the David Appleford Film & Theatre Review website.







For the record, it's English. I was born in Tilbury, Essex, made temporarily
American citizen?"























